Thursday, February 17, 2011

Who Was The 'Charles Dickens of 70's Skinhead Pulp Fiction'?: 1996 BBC Documentary Unveils The Real Richard Allen


It would have been harder to find a more unlikely person to chronicle and popularize the skinhead sub-culture of the late 60's and early 70's in the U.K. then James Moffatt. Using the pseudonym Richard Allen, this middle-aged, Canadian hack writer was hired by the New English Library publishing house in 1970 to write a pulp fiction 'exploitation' book about the skinhead movement which was then a social phenomena all across Britain.

Spending just three days in and around East London to interview a few skinheads, he used their true life stories as the basis of his first novel 'Skinhead' which was written in just five days time. Despite the formulaic quality of the book, it went on to sell over one million copies. Before Allen, most youth novels were written from an adult viewpoint and the heroes always mended their ways - usually under the influence of a benevolent or socially concerned teacher. Allen's heroes never mended their ways. As such, it's quite possible that 'Skinhead' was more widely read among British teenagers than any other novel of the day.


However true-to-life Allen's books may have been, they were also probably responsible for changing the image of skinheads from multi-racial reggae lovers into violent thugs and racists. How much of this was based on Allen's own politics is unclear.  Nevertheless, anti-immigrant and anti-Semitic overtones color all his novels as do a glorification of anti-social behavior. According to The Rough Guide To Cult Fiction:
'Allen’s first novel, Skinhead, uneasily combined self-righteous fascist rhetoric, nihilist indifference and the shocked voice of reason. But it succeed with its authentic portrayal of Joe Hawkins, the 16-year old gangster convinced the Cockneys had lost control of their patch, London, and whose life of rape, drink and hooliganism ends in a kind of triumph when he is jailed for beating a cop – a punishment which, he gloats, makes him king of the skinheads.'
The reaction to the publication of 'Skinhead' was so extreme that Allen added a preface to its sequel 'Suedehead' published in 1971, in which he insisted his books were not responsible for encouraging skinhead violence. Instead he blamed it on:
"leniency in courtrooms, catering to fads by mercenary-minded rag-trade merchants, a soft-peddling attitude by politicians who look for teenage votes to save their seats, and an overwhelming pandering by the news media"
Take that however you will, but its clear that his books did have a profound effect on the way that some skinheads viewed themselves and how British society and culture came to view them.  Whether or not the books popularity had anything to with the growth of right wing, racist skinheads is debatable (read a commentary on Allen as part of a review of Shane Meadows' 'This Is England'). More likely, the books were a forbidden thrill read for many a teenage boy in the early to mid 70's. To that end, the BBC aired an excellent documentary in 1996 titled 'Skinhead Farewell' about Allen that explored many of these themes.  You can watch it in its entirety below:








Not surprisingly, Allen never explored or included the true roots of skinhead culture in his books, which was decidedly multi-racial and based on a love of Jamaican music, culture and style.  Indeed, one of the most prominent skinheads in the U.K in the 1970's was Laurel Aitken.  As a counterpoint to Allen's skinhead stories, watch the short video below where Aitken and Doug Trendle (AKA Buster Bloodvessel of Bad Manners) describe the harmony between black and white skinheads who socialized together and were drawn together by their love of ska and reggae.

1 comment:

  1. Fantastic interviews/footage of Laurel and Buster (before he had the gastric surgery...boy he was heavy).

    Never picked up the Richard Allen books...but didn't know that they were on the racist/fascist side of things...(but it figures he was writing from ignorance of the scene and just plain ignorance itself).

    ReplyDelete